[ad_1]
Yesterday Xbox Head Phil Spencer announce Microsoft has committed to bringing Call Of Duty to Nintendo consoles for a 10-year deal. The same kind of 10-year work was given to Sony. But this does not mean that Call Of Duty will make its way to the Switch or the upcoming Nintendo consoles.
In part because the pledge from Spencer just shows regulators that their concerns about a monopoly on the franchise are not unfounded. For the past few months, Microsoft’s deal to buy Activision Blizzard has been met with skepticism from US and EU government agencies, with concerns that if the acquisition goes through, Call Of Duty to the Xbox and can hurt the competition. Microsoft needs to get a Call Of Duty game running on Nintendo hardware.
A task while not impossible, is a difficult one.
Is Call of Duty action right for Nintendo?
It does if you step back and think about it. Spencer is sure to make good on the promise if the Activision Blizzard deal goes through. That’s another bug in there and Microsoft needs to clean it up. Not to mention a requirement for him to guarantee that Nintendo will have access to future Call Of Duty games. There is something strange about seeing a Call Of Duty game on the Nintendo platform. That’s why the promise from Spencer seems more unlikely than anything.
However, the commitment to bring the franchise to Nintendo is the reason. Microsoft is trying to show regulators that it has no intention of keeping Call Of Duty from the PlayStation. And he plans to do that by getting the franchise in as many locations as possible.
Full steam ahead
Spencer made this same promise to Valve with its Steam platform. Call Of Duty has always been available on PC. But for some recent releases, the series is only available through Blizzard’s battle.net launcher. With the launch of Modern Warfare II on October 28, Steam is back in action. And Microsoft wants to keep it that way.
The main reason for that is to get a cut of those sales. This is the perfect reason for the company to continue to push the title on PlayStation consoles. PlayStation is a major platform for sales of Call Of Duty. And there’s no good reason Microsoft wants to throw that out the window.
Not to mention the trouble it takes to separate those toys. Is it weird to think about Call Of Duty on Nintendo? it’s true. Because Nintendo isn’t the platform you think of when you hear the name Call Of Duty.
For the most part, Nintendo is full of original family friendly titles. But you will also find a large collection of JRPGs and adult games like Bayonetta 3. Microsoft also launched Skyrim on Switch earlier this year. So, Call Of Duty on the same platform may be a little out there, but not too different. It is also worth noting that the acquisition of Activision Blizzard (if approved) may not be completed until the middle of next year.
Microsoft should start the process of making Call Of Duty on Nintendo. Which takes time. And there is a good chance that Nintendo will have new devices by then. The hardware is better at handling a game like Call Of Duty.
Microsoft has entered into a 10-year commitment to bring Call of Duty to @Nintendo after the merger of Microsoft and Activision Blizzard King. Microsoft is committed to helping bring more games to more people – however they choose to play. @ATVI_AB
— Phil Spencer (@XboxP3) December 7, 2022
[ad_2]
Source link
