Braverman illegally works on asylum seeker support, high court rules | Immigration and Asylum | Daily News Byte

Braverman illegally works on asylum seeker support, high court rules |  Immigration and Asylum

 | Daily News Byte

[ad_1]

The Home Secretary is acting unlawfully in failing to ensure the rate of support for more than 50,000 asylum seekers is adequate by not implementing an increase of around £5 a week recommended by officials, the High Court has ruled.

The case, brought to the High Court in Manchester by an asylum seeker known only as CB, challenged the amount of financial support given to asylum seekers during life crisis costs. Home Office advice to ministers was released, stating that officials told ministers that the current £40.85 per week is no longer enough to meet basic needs due to the cost of living in crisis.

An estimated 58,148 asylum seekers in self-catering accommodation receive cash assistance for basic needs such as food and travel. The level of support is calculated as the minimum required for daily survival. Those staying at the hotel receive about £8 a week as meals are provided for them.

The Home Secretary is legally required to review the base rate for asylum seekers to ensure that it meets subsistence needs. Financial support for asylum seekers is calculated at a much lower level than benefits.

Officials recommended that in light of rising inflation, rates should be increased to protect asylum seekers from destitution. On 15 November officials made it clear that the rate was to be raised immediately to £45 a week – an increase of around £5 – but this advice was not implemented.

A High Court order by Mr Justice Fordham on Friday said: “The Secretary of State for the Home Department has acted unlawfully since at least 14 November in failing to review the rate of asylum support to ensure that it is sufficient to meet the essential needs of life. of asylum seekers. She will be acting illegally unless or until the Secretary of State for the Home Department raises the rate of support.

CB said she brought the case because she was unable to provide for herself and her children’s basic needs at the £40.85 a person support level. “It seems like it’s getting harder and harder to survive day by day,” she said. “I go without clothes, toiletries and food, I need to try to give as much as possible to the children.”

Her lawyer, Josie Hicklin, welcomed the court’s findings. “The Home Secretary was warned that more than 50,000 people are receiving less than they need to meet their most basic needs. Without the bravery of our client the failure of the Secretary of State would not have been challenged,” she said.

A Home Office spokesman said: “The welfare of people in our care is of the utmost importance and we continue to ensure that those who would otherwise be destitute are given a weekly allowance for housing and food, clothing, transport and other items.

“We are carefully considering the judge’s comments and it would not be appropriate to comment while legal proceedings are ongoing.”

[ad_2]

Source link